<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Strategy on BumbleB Technologies</title><link>https://bumbleb.co/categories/strategy/</link><description>Recent content in Strategy on BumbleB Technologies</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-US</language><copyright>© 2024-2026 BumbleB Technologies Pvt. Ltd.</copyright><lastBuildDate>Sun, 31 May 2026 19:44:31 +0530</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://bumbleb.co/categories/strategy/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>We're Not Their Competition. We're Their Growth Channel.</title><link>https://bumbleb.co/blog/2026-05-31-growth-channel-not-competition/</link><pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2026 10:10:10 +0530</pubDate><guid>https://bumbleb.co/blog/2026-05-31-growth-channel-not-competition/</guid><description>&lt;h1 id="were-not-their-competition-were-their-growth-channel">We&amp;rsquo;re Not Their Competition. We&amp;rsquo;re Their Growth Channel.&lt;/h1>
&lt;h2 id="why-the-defensibility-question-for-a-vertical-ai-application-is-the-wrong-question--and-what-to-ask-instead">Why the defensibility question for a vertical AI application is the wrong question — and what to ask instead&lt;/h2>
&lt;p>The question arrives in the first ten minutes of almost every conversation about a vertical AI company, and it always carries a faint note of gotcha. &lt;em>What happens when the big platform decides to do this themselves?&lt;/em> The room leans in. It is treated as the question the founder has been avoiding, the soft spot under the thesis. And the instinct is to answer it on its own terms — to start describing the wall, the feature lead, the data advantage, the head start. To argue, in other words, that you can out-run a company a thousand times your size on its own track.&lt;/p></description></item></channel></rss>